- Journal List
- Eur J Dent
- v.14(3); 2020 Jul
- PMC7440957
As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice
Eur J Dent. 2020 Jul; 14(3): 335–341.
Published online 2020 Aug 13. doi:10.1055/s-0040-1714759
PMCID: PMC7440957
PMID: 32791529
Sandra Sarembe,1 Joachim Enax,2 Maria Morawietz,1 Andreas Kiesow,1 and Frederic Meyer2
Author information Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer
Abstract
Objective Oral care formulations aim to prevent oral diseases such as dental caries and gingivitis. Additionally, desire for white teeth still exists across all age groups. It is known that most whitening toothpastes are highly abrasive and can be harmful to teeth and gingiva. Therefore, a gel formulation with biomimetic hydroxyapatite (HAP; Ca5[PO4]3[OH]) as active ingredient was developed. This formulation was tested with respect to its tooth whitening properties in anin vitrostudy.
Materials and Methods Enamel samples were allocated to either group (a) HAP gel, (b) whitening mouth rinse with phosphates, or (c) negative control (distilled water). Test products were applied by finger (a) or were rinsed (b, c) for 1, 3, and 9 (b and c only) cycles, respectively.
Results Color changes (ΔE) were measured spectrophotometrically. Group (a) showed a significant increase in color changes with respect to whitening after one cycle (mean ΔE = 5.4 [±2.66],p ≤ 0.006) and three cycles (mean ΔE = 11.2 [±3.11],p< 0.0001) compared to groups (b) and (c). For group (b), a significant increase in color change was measured after three (mean ΔE = 2.77 [±1.01],p= 0.02) and nine cycles (mean ΔE = 3.27 [±1.61],p= 0.006) compared to (c). Group (c) showed only minor and statistically insignificant color changes.
Conclusion Thisin vitrostudy demonstrated a significantly higher ad hoc whitening effect of the HAP gel compared to the mouth rinse and water after short-time application.
Keywords: teeth whitening, hydroxyapatite, oral care, spectrophotometry
Introduction
Oral care products and formulations for teeth whitening have gained an increased attention worldwide. Many people prefer white teeth since its discoloration may affect their quality of life.1Besides, professional applications (e.g., bleaching with peroxides and professional dental cleaning), various whitening products for home use are commercially available. This includes, for example, whitening toothpastes, mouthwashes, and gels.12
Whitening formulations often contain abrasive agents (e.g. hydrated silica, alumina, perlite), chemical agents (e.g. phosphates), or optical agents (e.g. blue covarine).12However, highly abrasive agents and peroxides may induce unwanted side effects.34Toothpastes with high radioactive dentin abrasion (RDA) values may be harmful to exposed dentin and gingiva. Additionally, the use of peroxides could lead to tooth sensitivity and unwanted damage of the organic matrix of both enamel and dentin.1Therefore, research has focused on alternative nonoxidative, and less-abrasive tooth whitening agents.5One of these agents belong to the group of calcium phosphates like particulate hydroxyapatite (HAP; Ca5[PO4]3[OH]).156789In particular, biomimetic HAP is inspired by structure and composition of natural enamel crystallites10and shows a broad range of applications in preventive oral health care,11121314151617such as antibiofilm properties.18A recently published in vivo study has shown its positive properties to release calcium in dental biofilms.19This can be helpful to buffer cariogenic biofilms, and with increased calcium-levels leading to a shift from tooth demineralization to remineralization.1117
The aim of this in vitro study was to test the whitening effect of a newly developed gel formulation based on microcrystalline HAP. To exclude any abrasive influence by toothpaste abrasives harder than natural enamel,20and more importantly by the toothbrush that is used in daily oral care, this HAP-gel formulation does not contain commonly used abrasives (e.g. hydrated silica) and was applied by finger. This fact is of importance since the whitening effect of the toothpaste is mainly determined by abrasive ingredients and the mechanical cleaning efficacy of the toothbrush.1The assumed mode of action of the newly developed whitening formulation with HAP is based on its adhesion of particles on the enamel surface.
Consequently, the focus of this in vitro study was the analysis of the specific whitening effect of a HAP-containing containing gel. This would be helpful for individuals who prefer a brighter appearance of their teeth but are suffering from dentin hypersensitivity or patients suffering from gingivitis or periodontitis. Our hypothesis was that HAP would change the appearance of the natural tooth color to a brighter (whiter) color without having abrasive and/or oxidizing properties. A nonabrasive, commercially available whitening mouth rinse based on ethanol and phosphates served as positive control, and distilled water as negative control. The whitening effects of the different formulations were tested on bovine enamel samples using a pre–post design.
Materials and Methods
Treatment Products and Control Group
The whitening properties of three different groups were tested as follows:
Test product: HAP-based (15% w/w) oral care gel (Karex gelée; Dr. Kurt Wolff GmbH & Co. KG, Bielefeld, Germany).
Aqua, hydroxyapatite, glycerin, hydrogenated starch hydrolysate, calcium lactate, hydroxyethylcellulose PEG 40, hydrogenated castor oil, xylitol, calcium carbonate, hydroxyacetophenone, 1,2-hexanediol, caprylyl glycol, aroma, stevia rebaudiana leaf/stem powder, propylene glycol, sodium hydroxide, limonene, citral.
Positive control: whitening mouth rinse (Listerine Advance White, Johnson & Johnson GmbH, Neuss, Germany).
Aqua, alcohol, sorbitol, tetrapotassium pyrophosphate, pentasodium triphosphate, citric acid, poloxamer 407, sodium benzoate, eucalyptol, thymol, menthol, sodium sacharin, sodium fluoride (220 ppm F), tetrasodium pyrophosphate, propylene glycol, sucralose, aroma, disodium phosphate.
Negative control: distilled water (pH = 6.8).
Sample preparation
Bovine incisors were cleaned and embedded in epoxy resin (EpoFix; Struers, Cleveland, Ohio, United States). The buccal enamel surface was grinded to 1,200 grit by SiC abrasive paper (Struers, Cleveland, Ohio, United States). All enamel samples were stored in distilled water for 24 hours before starting the experiments.
Treatment with Test Product and Control Group
To ensure a comparison of the experimental data, all enamel samples were treated for 1 minute with the test products. The whole test procedure is depicted inFig.1.
Fig. 1
Overview of the test procedure for the analysis of (a) HAP-gel, (b) mouth rinse (positive control), and (c) distilled water (negative control). HAP, hydroxyapatite.
(a) HAP-gel: The HAP gel was applied by finger on the enamel surface (2 seconds,n= 8). After 1 minute, the samples were rinsed under agitation with distilled water and air dried at room temperature. The treatment procedure was repeated twice (three applications in total). Color measurements were carried out after first and third cycles.
(b) Mouth rinse and (c) control group: Enamel samples... were stored in group b (mouth rinse [n= 8]) or c (distilled water [n= 4]) for 1 minute by using a laboratory shaker. Afterwards the samples were rinsed under agitation with distilled water and air dried at room temperature. The treatment procedure was repeated eight times (nine applications in total). Color measurements were carried out after first, third, and ninth cycles. Nine treatment cycles were chosen for the mouth rinse testing in order to simulate a longer treatment period which is according to the manufacturers’ instructions.
Color Measurements
Tooth color and color changes (ΔE) were analyzed by a spectrophotometer (CM-3600A, Konica Minolta Sensing Europe B.V., Bremen, Germany) using a (L*a*b*) color space with coordinates: white–black (±L*), redness–greenness (±a*), and yellow–blueness (±b*). Color changes between the different measurement and the baseline measurement in each group were calculated by using the following equation:2122
ΔL*= L*after treatment–L*initial
Δa*= a*after treatment–a*initial
Δb*= b*after treatment–b*initial
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were conducted by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc Bonferroni’s test and Levene’s test for analyses of hom*ogeneity of variance (Origin 2019b; OriginLab Corporation Company, Northampton, Massachusetts, United States). The level of significance of α was set at ≤0.05.
Scanning Electron Microscopy
Surface analyses of the enamel samples at baseline and after one treatment cycle were performed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Quanta 3D FEG scanning electron microscope, FEI Company, Hillsboro, Oregon, United States). The samples were coated with an ultra-thin carbon film by evaporation before the SEM analyses.
Results
Color Measurement
Color measurement shows a significant increase in ∆E* after one cycle (5.14 [±2.66],p≤ 0.006) and after three cycles (11.2 [±3.11],p< 0.0001) in group (a) (HAP-group) compared to group (b) (whitening mouth rinse), and group (c) (water), respectively (Fig.2). No significant increase in ∆E was measured in group (b) after one cycle. Group (b) showed an increase in ∆E after three cycles (2.77 [±1.01],p= 0.02) and nine cycles (ΔE = 3.27 [±1.61],p= 0.006) compared to group (c). A similar trend as for ∆E* could be revealed for ΔL* and Δa* (Table1). These values increased after treatment with HAP-gel (group a) and whitening mouth rinse (group b) compared to water (group c), representing an increase in brightness and reddish (minor color shift). (minor color shift). For groups (a) and (b), a correlation on ΔL* and Δa* was observed with an increasing cycle number.
Fig. 2
ΔE* values of the HAP-gel (group a), mouth rinse (group b), and water (group c). In (a) color measurements were performed after 1 cycle and 3 cycles, while in (b) and (c) color measurements were also performed after 9 cycles. HAP, hydroxyapatite.
Table 1
Mean ∆L*, ∆a*, and ∆b* values after cycle 1, 3, or 9
| ∆L* | After cycle 1 | After cycle 3 | After cycle 9 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abbreviation: HAP, hydroxyapatite. | |||
| HAP-gel | 4.51 [±2.48] | 10.66 [±2.97] | Not performed |
| Mouth rinse | 0.93 [±0.81] | 2.31 [±1.02] | 3.08 [±1.43] |
| Water | 0.15 [±0.33] | 0.32 [±0.43] | 0.07 [±0.22] |
| ∆a* | |||
| HAP-gel | 0.59 [±0.17] | 1.10 [±0.19] | Not performed |
| Mouth rinse | 0.08 [±0.13] | 0.15 [±0.16] | 0.29 [±0.35] |
| Water | 0.15 [±0.33] | 0.06 [±0.06] | 0.01 [±0.03] |
| ∆b* | |||
| HAP-gel | -1.77 [±1.60] | -2.87 [±1.39] | Not performed |
| Mouth rinse | -0.62 [±1.00] | -0.88 [±1.19] | -0.07 [±1.12] |
| Water | 0.16 [±0.35] | -0.29 [±0.35] | -0.23 [±0.33] |
Open in a separate window
∆b* decreased significantly in group a, representing a decrease in yellowness of the enamel surface in the HAP-group. For groups (b) and (c), this effect could not be detected.
Scanning Electron Microscopy
SEM images show that the initial enamel surface is characterized by grinding marks resulting from the sample preparation (Fig.3A). After the treatment with the group (a), deposited particles were visible on the enamel surfaces (Fig.3B). It can be assumed that the particles consist of HAP. High-resolution SEM images of the deposited particles revealed rod and flat shaped crystallites (Fig.4), that could be assigned to HAP since its microstructure is known and described.10
Fig. 3
SEM images of enamel surfaces before and after treatment: (A) baseline, (B) after HAP-gel treatment, (C) after mouth rinse treatment, (D) after water treatment. HAP, hydroxyapatite; SEM, scanning electron microscope.
Fig. 4
High-resolution SEM image of the deposited particles after HAP-gel treatment. HAP, hydroxyapatite; SEM, scanning electron microscope.
After treatment with group (b), the enamel surface seems to be slightly smoothed by a thin layer formation compared to the initial sample surface (Fig.3C). Furthermore, single particles were visible on the surface. The origin of these particles is not known. No changes could be detected after treatment with group (c) (Fig.3D).
Discussions
This in vitro study shows that the tested HAP oral gel led to an increase in ΔE, thus to a whiter tooth color already after one-time application. This effect could be enhanced by regu- larly performed applications of the gel (Fig.2). The tooth whitening properties of the HAP-gel can be explained by HAP’s adhesion to the tooth surface. Fabritius-Vilpoux et al showed in an in vitro study that HAP particles of a mouth rinse adhere to enamel surfaces;10this is confirmed by the SEM investigation performed in the present study. The quantity of adhesion can be increased by higher concentrations of HAP, i.e. 10% HAP showed a higher enamel coverage compared to 1 and 5% HAP.10Additionally, Niwa et al found a whitening optimum by using 15% HAP in a toothpaste formulation.9Based on these findings, the concentration of HAP was chosen to be of 15% in the tested oral care gel. Kensche et al and Lelli et al confirmed the adhesion of HAP to tooth surfaces also under in situ conditions and with an ex–in vivo study design, respectively.2324Our results are in good agreement with other studies that analyzed the teeth whitening effects of HAP.5678925Niwa et al, for example, analyzed the in vivo whitening effect of toothpastes with 0, 3, and 15% HAP. They found that the whitening effect could be increased by higher HAP concentrations. Interestingly, in an additional in vitro experiment it was shown that the polishing properties were not altered when higher HAP concentrations were used.9This clearly underlines that HAP, in contrast to abrasives with a high-relative hardness (e.g. perlite, a mineral of silicate; alumina, Al2O3),20is a suitable whitening agent which does not lead to a damage of tooth or gingiva. Moreover, HAP reduces the roughness of the teeth.25Dabanoglu et al and Jin et al showed that different calcium phosphates including HAP contribute to tooth whitening in vitro.57Besides the adhesion of HAP particles to the tooth surface as described above, remineralization effect of HAP may also contribute to tooth whitening (i.e. due to a smoother surface on which stains cannot attach).9112627An advantage of the use of the HAP in a gel formulation is the good adhesion to the tooth surface. It can be easily applied by using the finger after tooth brushing and also showed both remineralization effects26and erosion protective properties.1728Bommer et al reported that a self-assembling peptide matrix can act as an adhesive for HAP particles improving the whitening effect of HAP alone.6A similar effect could be observed in HAP group of our study. The matrix of the HAP-gel may further increase the HAP-adhesion to the tooth surface compared to HAP-particles alone (which already show a good adhesion to tooth surfaces51023). Future studies should be carried out to analyze the whitening effect of the HAP-gel also underin vivoconditions. To date, only a fewin vivostudies on the whitening effects of HAP been published.6929In situstudies show an efficient reduction of bacterial colonization to enamel surfaces by using HAP-based mouth rinses.182330This might be also an important factor for tooth whitening since stains are often incorporated into dental plaque.1
In contrast to the HAP-gel, the tested mouth rinse showed only minor whitening effects in our in vitro setting after one, three, and nine cycles. This may be explained by the different mode of action compared to HAP. The SEM images showed that HAP adheres to the tooth surface; however, only a thin layer of unknown deposits was detectable in the mouth rinse group (Figs. 3B3C).3C). Thus, the mouth rinse may support (e.g. by its ingredients ethanol and phosphates, as well as by an acidic pH) the stain removal action of toothbrush and toothpaste,31but does not lead to the formation a white (protective) layer on the tooth surface. Other test approaches are necessary to understand completely the whiting mechanisms of such mouth rinses. Further testing should also involve model refinement, i.e. it would be of interest to include experimental steps in the protocol in order to examine the stability of the whitening effect against chemical (mimicking acid challenges of daily food intake) and/or mechanical (mimicking tongue and mucosa movement or saliva flow or tooth brushing) stress.
Additionally, oral-care formulations based on HAP show not only whitening properties, but was also tested to be effective in preventing cavities, improvement of gingival health, and reduction of dentin hypersensitivity.11Biomimetic ingredients based on HAP used in oral care show a high compatibility, since the mineral phase of the teeth and bones mainly consists of calcium and phosphate.3233
Conclusion
To conclude, thein vitromodel tested in this study can be used as basic-approach for further testing of nonabrasive whitening agents.
In this study, the nonabrasive HAP-gel showed the highest values on tooth-whitening when compared to a mouth rinse with whitening-agents. Therefore, HAP particles may be suited to be a gentle, fast, and biomimetic approach for cosmetic tooth whitening.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Carolin Ufer for the support in the sample preparation and Jasmin Zuehlke for performing the scanning electron microscopy analysis (both Fraunhofer Institute for Microstructure of Materials and Systems IMWS, Halle, Germany).
Funding Statement
FundingThis study was funded by Dr. Kurt Wolff GmbH & Co. KG, Bielefeld, Germany.
Footnotes
Authors’ ContributionsConflict of Interest S.S., J.E., M.M. A.K., and F.M. prepared the study protocol; S.S. performed conduction and analysis of the experiments; S.S., J.E., M.M. A.K., and F.M. took part in preparation of the publication manuscript.
None declared.
References
1. Epple M, Meyer F, Enax J. A Critical Review of Modern Concepts for Teeth Whitening. Dent J (Basel) 2019;7(03):E79. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Joiner A.Whitening toothpastes: a review of the literature J Dent 201038(suppl 2)e17–e24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Vieira G HA, Nogueira M B, Gaio E J, Rosing C K, Santiago S L, Rego R O. Effect of whitening toothpastes on dentin abrasion: an in vitro study. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2016;14(06):547–553. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Omar F, Ab-Ghani Z, Rahman N A, Halim M S. Nonprescription bleaching versus home bleaching with professional prescriptions: which one is safer? A comprehensive review of color changes and their side effects on human enamel. Eur J Dent. 2019;13(04):589–598. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Dabanoglu A, Wood C, García-Godoy F, Kunzelmann K H. Whitening effect and morphological evaluation of hydroxyapatite materials. Am J Dent. 2009;22(01):23–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6. Bommer C, Flessa H P, Xu X, Kunzelmann K H. Hydroxyapatite and Self-assembling peptide matrix for non-oxidizing tooth whitening. J Clin Dent. 2018;29(02):57–63. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Jin J, Xu X, Lai G, Kunzelmann K H. Efficacy of tooth whitening with different calcium phosphate-based formulations. Eur J Oral Sci. 2013;121(04):382–388. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Kim B I, Jeong S H, Jang S O, Kim K N, Kwon H K, Park Y D. Tooth whitening effect of toothpastes containing nano-hydroxyapatite. Key Eng Mater. 2006;309–311:541–544. [Google Scholar]
9. Niwa M, Sato T, Li W, Aoki H, Aoki H, Daisaku T. Polishing and whitening properties of toothpaste containing hydroxyapatite. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2001;12(03):277–281. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10. Fabritius-Vilpoux K, Enax J, Herbig M, Raabe D, Fabritius H-O. Quantitative affinity parameters of synthetic hydroxyapatite and enamel surfaces in vitro. Bioinspir Biomim Nan. 2019;8:141–153. [Google Scholar]
11. Enax J, Fabritius H O, Fabritius-Vilpoux K, Amaechi B T, Meyer F. Modes of action and clinical efficacy of particulate hydroxyapatite in preventive oral health care – state of the art. Open Dent J. 2019;13:274–287. [Google Scholar]
12. Hu M-L, Zheng G, Zhang Y-D, Yan X, Li X-C, Lin H. Effect of desensitizing toothpastes on dentine hypersensitivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2018;75:12–21. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Hiller K-A, Buchalla W, Grillmeier I, Neubauer C, Schmalz G. In vitro effects of hydroxyapatite containing toothpastes on dentin permeability after multiple applications and ageing. Sci Rep. 2018;8(01):4888. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Harks I, Jockel-Schneider Y, Schlagenhauf U et al. Impact of the daily use of a microcrystal hydroxyapatite dentifrice on de novo plaque formation and clinical/microbiological parameters of periodontal health. A randomized trial. PLoS One. 2016;11(07):e0160142. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15. Hagenfeld D, Prior K, Harks I et al. No differences in microbiome changes between anti-adhesive and antibacterial ingredients in toothpastes during periodontal therapy. J Periodontal Res. 2019;54(04):435–443. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Schlagenhauf U, Kunzelmann K-H, Hannig C et al. Impact of a non-fluoridated microcrystalline hydroxyapatite dentifrice on enamel caries progression in highly caries-susceptible orthodontic patients: A randomized, controlled 6-month trial. J Investig Clin Dent. 2019;10(02):e12399. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Cieplik F, Rupp C M, Hirsch S et al. Ca2+ release and buffering effects of synthetic hydroxyapatite following bacterial acid challenge. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(01):85. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Meyer F, Enax J. Hydroxyapatite in oral biofilm management. Eur J Dent. 2019;13(02):287–290. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Sudradjat H, Meyer F, Loza K, Epple M, Enax J. In vivo effects of a hydroxyapatite-based oral care gel on the calcium and phosphorus levels of dental plaque. Eur J Dent. 2020;14(02):206–211. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20. Enax J, Epple M. Die Charakterisierung von Putzkörpern in Zahnpasten. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 2018;73:116–124. [Google Scholar]
21. León K, Mery D, Pedreschi F, León J. Color measurement in L*a*b* units from RGB digital images. Food Res Int. 2006;39:1084–1091. [Google Scholar]
22. Ceci M, Viola M, Rattalino D, Beltrami R, Colombo M, Poggio C. Discoloration of different esthetic restorative materials: a spectrophotometric evaluation. Eur J Dent. 2017;11(02):149–156. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Kensche A, Holder C, Basche S, Tahan N, Hannig C, Hannig M. Efficacy of a mouthrinse based on hydroxyapatite to reduce initial bacterial colonisation in situ. Arch Oral Biol. 2017;80:18–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24. Lelli M, Putignano A, Marchetti M et al. Remineralization and repair of enamel surface by biomimetic Zn-carbonate hydroxyapatite containing toothpaste: a comparative in vivo study. Front Physiol. 2014;5:333. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Reis P Q, da Silva E M, Calazans F S et al. Effect of a dentifrice containing nanohydroxyapatite on the roughness, color, lightness, and brightness of dental enamel subjected to a demineralization challenge. Gen Dent. 2018;66(04):66–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Amaechi B T, AbdulAzees P A, Alshareif D O et al. Comparative efficacy of a hydroxyapatite and a fluoride toothpaste for prevention and remineralization of dental caries in children. BDJ Open. 2019;5:18. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27. Tschoppe P, Zandim D L, Martus P, Kielbassa A M. Enamel and dentine remineralization by nano-hydroxyapatite toothpastes. J Dent. 2011;39(06):430–437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Colombo M, Beltrami R, Rattalino D, Mirando M, Chiesa M, Poggio C. Protective effects of a zinc-hydroxyapatite toothpaste on enamel erosion: SEM study. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2017;7(03):38–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29. Steinert S, Zwanzig K, Doenges H, Kuchenbecker J, Meyer F, Enax J. Daily application of a toothpaste with biomimetic hydroxyapatite and its subjective impact on dentin hypersensitivity, tooth smoothness, tooth whitening, gum bleeding, and feeling of freshness. Biomimetics (Basel) 2020;5(02):E17. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Hannig C, Basche S, Burghardt T, Al-Ahmad A, Hannig M. Influence of a mouthwash containing hydroxyapatite microclusters on bacterial adherence in situ. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(03):805–814. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. van Loveren C.edToothpastes. Amsterdam: Karger Publications 2013. Doi: 10.1159/isbn.978-3-318-02207-0 [Google Scholar]
32. Epple M. Review of potential health risks associated with nanoscopic calcium phosphate. Acta Biomater. 2018;77:1–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Meyer F, Amaechi B T, Fabritius H O, Enax J. Overview of calcium phosphates used in biomimetic oral care. Open Dent J. 2018;12:406–423. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Articles from European Journal of Dentistry are provided here courtesy of Dental Investigations Society
